Lumbee vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Choctaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Lumbee
Choctaw
31.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,775,991 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 31.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,402,535 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 49.6%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Choctaw |
Minimum | 5.4% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.6% | 93.3% |
Mean | 42.9% | 33.8% |
Median | 42.9% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.2% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.7% | 35.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 18.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Puerto Rican (32.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and Pima (29.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Grenada (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Kiowa (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Central America (21.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Haiti (21.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |