Immigrants from Cuba vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,278,905 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 24.1%), median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $40,299, a difference of 21.0%), and median earnings ($38,426 compared to $44,552, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $51,844, a difference of 2.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,662 compared to $85,571, a difference of 6.1%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $75,647, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 29.0%), receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 65.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 58.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 22.9%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (68.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 241.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 64.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 29.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 63.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 27.2%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 15.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.4%).