Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Immigrants from Laos
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Immigrants from Laos
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,671,605 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,465,206 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Immigrants from Laos |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 32.0% | 13.9% |
| Range | 31.3% | 12.5% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.0% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |