Immigrants from Ecuador vs Native/Alaskan Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Native/Alaskan
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Natives/Alaskans
43.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Native/Alaskan Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,997,790 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 43.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,977,387 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.760 and weighted average of 42.8%, a difference of 0.94%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 37.2% | 19.1% |
| Maximum | 71.9% | 53.7% |
| Range | 34.7% | 34.6% |
| Mean | 45.3% | 38.9% |
| Median | 44.1% | 41.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.9% | 32.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.8% | 45.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Natives/Alaskans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Chippewa (43.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Apache (43.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Kiowa (43.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from El Salvador (43.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Central American Indian (43.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Guatemalan (42.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Ghanaian (42.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |