Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Palestinian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,912,520 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.252% in Palestinians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 252.2 Palestinians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $45,790, a difference of 13.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $98,777, a difference of 8.2%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $57,778, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $107,721, a difference of 3.9%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $63,800, a difference of 4.0%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.14%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.050%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.6%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.13%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.50%).