Luxembourger vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Cypriots

Excellent
Excellent
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,656,467 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 27.5 Cypriots.
Luxembourger Integration in Cypriot Communities

Luxembourger vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $54,899, a difference of 20.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $116,364, a difference of 19.7%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $127,064, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.59%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $52,209, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $45,570, a difference of 14.2%).
Luxembourger vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerCypriot
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Luxembourger vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.77%), female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Luxembourger vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerCypriot
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
8.9%

Luxembourger vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Luxembourger vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerCypriot
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Luxembourger vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 33.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Luxembourger vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
84.1%

Luxembourger vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.14%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.3%).
Luxembourger vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerCypriot
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Exceptional
27.0%

Luxembourger vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 192.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 12.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 25.6%).
Luxembourger vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.0%

Luxembourger vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 50.3%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 42.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Luxembourger vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.6%

Luxembourger vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Luxembourger vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerCypriot
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%