Luxembourger vs Danish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Danes

Excellent
Excellent
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Danish Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,043,979 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Danes within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Danes.
Luxembourger Integration in Danish Communities

Luxembourger vs Danish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Danish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $37,730, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,041, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $97,221, a difference of 0.020%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $56,246, a difference of 0.10%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $105,900, a difference of 0.27%).
Luxembourger vs Danish Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerDanish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Good
$44,095
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Excellent
$105,900
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Excellent
$87,676
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Average
$46,392
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Excellent
$56,246
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$37,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Excellent
$53,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Excellent
$97,221
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$105,619
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$63,117
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
31.0%

Luxembourger vs Danish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Danish communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 8.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Luxembourger vs Danish Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerDanish
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
8.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.0%

Luxembourger vs Danish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
Luxembourger vs Danish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerDanish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%

Luxembourger vs Danish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Luxembourger vs Danish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerDanish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
44.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Luxembourger vs Danish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Danish communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.4%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Danish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerDanish
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
51.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
50.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Exceptional
28.7%

Luxembourger vs Danish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Danish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.5%), no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 18.4%).
Luxembourger vs Danish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerDanish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
93.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
63.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
24.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.6%

Luxembourger vs Danish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Luxembourger vs Danish Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerDanish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Good
1.9%

Luxembourger vs Danish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Danish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Luxembourger vs Danish Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerDanish
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%