Serbian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Chippewa
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,350,230 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 33.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 56.7% | 87.6% |
| Range | 51.7% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 38.7% |
| Median | 20.7% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |