Native Hawaiian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Chippewa
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,771,814 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 34.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 61.4% | 87.6% |
| Range | 59.3% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 22.5% | 38.7% |
| Median | 20.0% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |