Laotian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Laotian
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Laotians
Chippewa
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,876,805 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 39.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Chippewa |
Minimum | 12.6% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 64.9% | 87.6% |
Range | 52.3% | 75.7% |
Mean | 22.3% | 38.7% |
Median | 18.7% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.6% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Egypt (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (19.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |