Serbian vs Slovene Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Slovene
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Slovenes
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Slovene Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,350,230 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,900,549 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 0.62%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Slovene |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 56.7% | 67.0% |
| Range | 51.7% | 61.1% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 22.9% |
| Median | 20.7% | 20.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Slovenes by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |