Afghan vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Afghan
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Afghans
Chippewa
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,055,541 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 37.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 87.6% |
| Range | 34.4% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 20.2% | 38.7% |
| Median | 18.9% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |