Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Chippewa
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,222,797 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 34.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Chippewa |
Minimum | 9.4% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 33.7% | 87.6% |
Range | 24.3% | 75.7% |
Mean | 19.6% | 38.7% |
Median | 19.0% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |