Immigrants from England vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Chippewa
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 384,642,935 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.788 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 32.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Chippewa |
Minimum | 17.4% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
Range | 82.6% | 75.7% |
Mean | 39.8% | 38.7% |
Median | 32.0% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.2% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.2% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.0% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.0% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.5% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |