Immigrants from Israel vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Chippewa
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,619,232 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 46.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 28.6% | 87.6% |
| Range | 25.2% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 38.7% |
| Median | 16.3% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Pakistan (18.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |