Immigrants from Indonesia vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Chippewa
18.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,892,292 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.823 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 41.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Chippewa |
Minimum | 9.1% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
Range | 90.9% | 75.7% |
Mean | 24.9% | 38.7% |
Median | 18.5% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |