Serbian vs Ethiopian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Ethiopian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Ethiopians
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Ethiopian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,350,230 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,686,273 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 56.7% | 33.2% |
| Range | 51.7% | 28.4% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 18.6% |
| Median | 20.7% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Ethiopians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Carpatho Rusyn (20.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |