Serbian vs Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Serbian
Chippewa
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Serbians
Chippewa
30.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
78.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,582,376 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 30.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,326,129 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 38.9%.
![Serbian vs Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/births-to-unmarried-women/serbians-vs-chippewa-births-to-unmarried-women-chart.webp)
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Serbian | Chippewa |
Minimum | 4.2% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 95.8% | 90.0% |
Mean | 39.6% | 71.0% |
Median | 33.4% | 75.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.3% | 45.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.4% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.1% | 54.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 27.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 27.7% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Chilean (30.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (30.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Italian (30.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Polish (30.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Oceania (30.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |
Serbians | 78.8 /100 | #149 | Good 30.7% |
Somalis | 77.8 /100 | #150 | Good 30.7% |
Italians | 77.0 /100 | #151 | Good 30.8% |
Poles | 76.2 /100 | #152 | Good 30.8% |
British | 76.0 /100 | #153 | Good 30.8% |
Yugoslavians | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 30.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 73.9 /100 | #155 | Good 30.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 73.5 /100 | #156 | Good 30.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Paiute (42.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Native/Alaskan (43.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (42.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Tsimshian (42.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Kiowa (43.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 42.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 42.5% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 42.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 43.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 43.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 44.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 44.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 45.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 45.7% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 46.6% |