Serbian vs Syrian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Syrian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Syrians
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Syrian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,350,230 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,006,420 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 0.63%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Serbian | Syrian |
Minimum | 5.0% | 0.97% |
Maximum | 56.7% | 58.7% |
Range | 51.7% | 57.7% |
Mean | 21.7% | 21.0% |
Median | 20.7% | 20.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 26.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Syrians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |