Immigrants from Venezuela vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Venezuela
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Venezuela
Chippewa
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Venezuela vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,137,962 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Venezuela and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 32.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Venezuela | Chippewa |
Minimum | 2.3% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 33.4% | 87.6% |
Range | 31.0% | 75.7% |
Mean | 18.0% | 38.7% |
Median | 19.0% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.8% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Venezuela by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Venezuela are Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Canada (20.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |