Macedonian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Macedonian
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Macedonians
Chippewa
18.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,464,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 41.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 87.6% |
| Range | 37.0% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 17.9% | 38.7% |
| Median | 17.6% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |