Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chippewa
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,919 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 37.2%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chippewa |
Minimum | 3.8% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 44.8% | 87.6% |
Range | 41.0% | 75.7% |
Mean | 18.7% | 38.7% |
Median | 17.2% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |