Scandinavian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Scandinavians
Chippewa
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,288,786 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 27.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 17.8% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
| Range | 82.2% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 42.1% | 38.7% |
| Median | 32.4% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.3% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.3% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.0% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.6% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.3% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.10%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |