Immigrants from Bolivia vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Chippewa
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,883,444 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 50.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Chippewa |
Minimum | 3.6% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 82.5% | 87.6% |
Range | 78.9% | 75.7% |
Mean | 19.6% | 38.7% |
Median | 17.3% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |