Immigrants from Serbia vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Chippewa
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,863,252 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 42.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Chippewa |
Minimum | 2.5% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 41.7% | 87.6% |
Range | 39.1% | 75.7% |
Mean | 17.8% | 38.7% |
Median | 17.1% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.0% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |