Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Caribbean
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Caribbean
Chippewa
22.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,756,238 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260 and weighted average of 22.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 19.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 8.5% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 34.5% | 87.6% |
| Range | 25.9% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 21.6% | 38.7% |
| Median | 21.7% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.6% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Caribbean by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Caribbean are Belizean (22.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (22.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bahamas (22.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Liberian (22.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from West Indies (22.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |