Salvadoran vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Chickasaw
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Salvadorans
Chickasaw
12.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,362,950 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,403,073 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 19.9%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Salvadoran | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 29.7% | 26.4% |
Range | 27.7% | 24.4% |
Mean | 12.6% | 11.9% |
Median | 12.0% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 4.4% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Kiowa (12.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Uruguay (12.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.8%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from South America (12.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.9%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Blackfeet | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 12.8% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 12.9% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.0% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Ethiopian (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Fijian (10.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 77.3 /100 | #150 | Good 10.6% |
Spanish | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |
Fijians | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 74.9 /100 | #154 | Good 10.7% |
Chickasaw | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 10.7% |
Ethiopians | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.9 /100 | #157 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 71.7 /100 | #158 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.8 /100 | #159 | Good 10.7% |
Sudanese | 68.2 /100 | #160 | Good 10.7% |
Arabs | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 64.8 /100 | #162 | Good 10.8% |