Guatemalan vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
South American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
South American Indians
23.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,542,149 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 15.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | South American Indian |
Minimum | 12.4% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 87.6% | 97.4% |
Mean | 33.7% | 31.1% |
Median | 28.4% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 41.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 25.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 23.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |