Guatemalan vs Nonimmigrants Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Nonimmigrants
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Nonimmigrants
23.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Nonimmigrants Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,542,149 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,693,652 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Nonimmigrants |
| Minimum | 12.4% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 47.5% |
| Range | 87.6% | 36.9% |
| Mean | 33.7% | 21.2% |
| Median | 28.4% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Nonimmigrants by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |