Guatemalan vs Immigrants Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Immigrants
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Immigrants
23.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
22.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Immigrants Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,542,149 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,808,964 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 21.4%, a difference of 11.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Immigrants |
| Minimum | 12.4% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 47.5% |
| Range | 87.6% | 36.9% |
| Mean | 33.7% | 21.2% |
| Median | 28.4% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 4.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Nigerian (21.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kenya (21.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Haiti (21.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |