Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Czechoslovakian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Czechoslovakians
23.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,542,149 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,916,280 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 11.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 12.4% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 87.6% | 92.6% |
| Mean | 33.7% | 33.3% |
| Median | 28.4% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 39.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 21.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |