Guatemalan vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Choctaw
23.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,542,149 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 14.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 12.4% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 87.6% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 33.7% | 41.2% |
| Median | 28.4% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |