Guatemalan vs British West Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
British West Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
British West Indians
23.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs British West Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,542,149 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,955,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128 and weighted average of 22.8%, a difference of 4.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | British West Indian |
Minimum | 12.4% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 61.7% |
Range | 87.6% | 60.3% |
Mean | 33.7% | 22.6% |
Median | 28.4% | 21.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 26.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and British West Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.56%), Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.48%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |