Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Latin America Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Immigrants from Latin America
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Immigrants from Latin America
23.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Latin America Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,542,149 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,789,164 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 23.7%, a difference of 0.56%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Latin America |
Minimum | 12.4% | 8.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 68.5% |
Range | 87.6% | 60.0% |
Mean | 33.7% | 23.7% |
Median | 28.4% | 23.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 21.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Immigrants from Latin America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.51%), Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |