New Zealander vs Alsatian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
New Zealander
Alsatian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
New Zealanders
Alsatians
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Alsatian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,920,080 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,680,655 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 0.22% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 12.1% |
| Range | 13.6% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 4.9% |
| Median | 3.8% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Alsatians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |