New Zealander vs Immigrants from Norway Hearing Disability
COMPARE
New Zealander
Immigrants from Norway
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
New Zealanders
Immigrants from Norway
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Immigrants from Norway Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,920,080 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,704,469 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.17%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Immigrants from Norway |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 20.5% |
| Range | 13.6% | 19.1% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 6.0% |
| Median | 3.8% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Immigrants from Norway by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |