New Zealander vs Immigrants from Denmark Hearing Disability
COMPARE
New Zealander
Immigrants from Denmark
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
New Zealanders
Immigrants from Denmark
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
16.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Immigrants from Denmark Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,920,080 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,425,612 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 2.2%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Immigrants from Denmark |
Minimum | 0.53% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 12.5% |
Range | 13.6% | 12.0% |
Mean | 4.3% | 4.0% |
Median | 3.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Immigrants from Denmark by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |