New Zealander vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
New Zealander
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
New Zealanders
Sub-Saharan Africans
47.4%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,918,657 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142 and weighted average of 47.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 11.2%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 14.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 80.4% | 84.5% |
| Range | 66.1% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 53.0% | 40.3% |
| Median | 53.9% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.0% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.4% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.4% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Jordan (47.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Okinawan (47.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Portuguese (47.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Sri Lankan (47.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Laotian (47.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Syrians | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 88.6 /100 | #121 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Osage | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 87.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Laotians | 86.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Okinawans | 85.3 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 84.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.4% |
| New Zealanders | 84.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Portuguese | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Sri Lankans | 83.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 82.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Afghans | 81.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 81.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 47.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |