Celtic vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Celtic
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Celtics
Sub-Saharan Africans
47.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,877,326 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 47.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 12.3%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 21.4% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 84.5% |
| Range | 78.6% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 50.8% | 40.3% |
| Median | 50.7% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.4% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.2% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Sweden (47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Turkish (47.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Cypriot (47.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (47.8%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Lebanese | 95.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 94.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Egyptians | 94.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 94.8 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 94.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Celtics | 94.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 94.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Turks | 93.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Cypriots | 93.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Serbians | 93.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 93.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 93.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 47.7% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 92.9 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |