Celtic vs Subsaharan African No Schooling Completed
COMPARE
Celtic
Subsaharan African
No Schooling Completed
No Schooling Completed Comparison
Celtics
Sub-Saharan Africans
1.6%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Subsaharan African No Schooling Completed Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,819,688 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.701 and weighted average of 1.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 500,622,971 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 41.0%.
No Schooling Completed Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 0.39% |
| Maximum | 8.4% | 10.3% |
| Range | 8.2% | 9.9% |
| Mean | 1.6% | 2.9% |
| Median | 1.4% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.87% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by No Schooling Completed
Demographics Similar to Celtics by No Schooling Completed
In terms of no schooling completed, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (1.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Scotland (1.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Chippewa (1.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Canada (1.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Creek (1.6%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Schooling Completed |
| Australians | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Ottawa | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Chippewa | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Creek | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Crow | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Greeks | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Austrians | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by No Schooling Completed
In terms of no schooling completed, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sudan (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Tohono O'odham (2.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Sudanese (2.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Schooling Completed |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Tongans | 6.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 6.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Senegalese | 5.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 5.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 4.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sudanese | 4.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 4.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.3% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 3.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 3.6 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.3% |