Ute vs Czechoslovakian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Ute
Czechoslovakian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Ute
Czechoslovakians
33.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
14.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
38.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Czechoslovakian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,718,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 33.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 341,149,563 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 32.0%, a difference of 3.0%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 12.5% | 24.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 87.5% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 57.2% | 57.5% |
| Median | 47.5% | 47.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.4% | 36.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 71.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 70.6% | 34.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.9% | 25.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.7% | 25.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Czechoslovakians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Africa (33.0%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (33.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Micronesia (32.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (32.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Germany (32.8%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Welsh (32.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Osage (32.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kenya (32.1%, a difference of 0.11%), German (32.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tlingit-Haida (32.2%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Germans | 39.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 32.0% |
| Welsh | 38.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 32.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
| Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
| Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
| Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
| Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
| Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
| Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
| Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
| German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |