Immigrants from Moldova vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,055,082 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 24.9 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $34,195, a difference of 38.9%), median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $44,010, a difference of 35.0%), and median earnings ($50,274 compared to $38,907, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $55,573, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $53,077, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 50.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 37.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 80.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 41.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.34%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 109.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 84.3%), and professional degree (4.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%).