Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
✖
Ugandan
✖
Single Female Poverty
✖
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Ugandans
16.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,865,263 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 26.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 27.8% | 94.5% |
| Mean | 14.5% | 23.7% |
| Median | 14.1% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 17.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 1.7%), Chinese (16.1%, a difference of 2.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |