Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Turkey
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Immigrants from Turkey

Excellent
Excellent
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,861
SOCIAL INDEX
86.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
43rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Turkey Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,289,723 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 46.0 Immigrants from Turkey.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Turkey Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $52,503, a difference of 3.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $114,407, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $118,325, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $107,258, a difference of 0.35%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $66,672, a difference of 0.45%), and per capita income ($51,770 compared to $51,368, a difference of 0.78%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Turkey
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Exceptional
$51,368
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Exceptional
$118,325
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Exceptional
$96,964
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Exceptional
$52,960
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Exceptional
$62,728
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Exceptional
$44,066
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Good
$52,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Exceptional
$107,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Exceptional
$114,407
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Exceptional
$66,672
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
27.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.2%), male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and poverty (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Turkey
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.42%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Turkey
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Turkey
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.7%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.57%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Turkey
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Good
46.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Turkey
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
53.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.9%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Turkey
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Exceptional
65.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
53.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
46.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Turkey Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Turkey
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%