Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,577,185 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.278% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 278.2 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and South American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $44,114, a difference of 17.4%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $54,492, a difference of 14.2%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $101,856, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $53,939, a difference of 0.77%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $39,698, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and South American communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 28.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and South American communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and South American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.6%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (63.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and South American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and South American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.7%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and South American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.96%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%).