Apache vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Apache
Chinese
9.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,238,952 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 145.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache | Chinese |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 52.5% | 17.1% |
| Range | 48.2% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 4.2% |
| Median | 12.6% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Apache by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 2.9%), Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 5.4%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and Crow (9.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |