Immigrants from Taiwan vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Taiwan
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Taiwan
Chinese
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 295,998,361 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 13.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Taiwan | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 10.3% | 17.1% |
Range | 9.3% | 16.7% |
Mean | 4.1% | 4.2% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 4.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Taiwan by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Cypriot (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Danish (4.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Scandinavian (4.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |