Immigrants from Liberia vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,804,518 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 50.9%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Liberia	Chinese
Minimum	0.42%	0.44%
Maximum	29.8%	17.1%
Range	29.4%	16.7%
Mean	5.8%	4.2%
Median	4.9%	3.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.6%	2.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.8%	4.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.2%	1.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.5%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.4%	3.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	14.4 /100 \| #210	Poor 5.5%
Nigerians	14.3 /100 \| #211	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Thailand	14.0 /100 \| #212	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Liberia	13.3 /100 \| #213	Poor 5.5%
Iroquois	13.1 /100 \| #214	Poor 5.5%
Armenians	12.8 /100 \| #215	Poor 5.5%
Potawatomi	12.4 /100 \| #216	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	11.3 /100 \| #217	Poor 5.5%
Afghans	11.2 /100 \| #218	Poor 5.5%
Japanese	9.8 /100 \| #219	Tragic 5.6%
Colombians	9.2 /100 \| #220	Tragic 5.6%

Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 3.6%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 3.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 3.7%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 3.8%
Swedes	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 3.9%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 3.9%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 3.9%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 3.9%
Croatians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 3.9%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 3.9%
Lithuanians	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 4.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 4.0%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.0%
Slovaks	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.0%
Poles	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.0%