Pakistani vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pakistani
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Pakistanis
Chinese
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
96.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 333,416,483 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 29.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.63% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 41.7% | 17.1% |
| Range | 41.0% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 4.2% |
| Median | 5.2% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |