Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
Chinese
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,936,047 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 34.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.54% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 11.2% | 17.1% |
Range | 10.6% | 16.7% |
Mean | 4.3% | 4.2% |
Median | 4.1% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Immigrants from Hungary (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |